JNU PROTESTS: THE TRUTH AND THE OUTRAGE
The protests in Jawaharlal Nehru
University (JNU) has been going on for quite some time now. Though the media
is coming up with a number of stories and facts regarding JNU, there is one
facet of JNU protests that only very few news pages are talking about. While
students are protesting against the sudden hike in fees, news channels are
diverting our attention to the age of the students of JNU. Media is also going to the extent of doing photoshop and providing fake information regarding some students of JNU (probably to spread this propaganda!!); where on earth is journalism, where are we supposed to get news from?Being a doctorate
myself, I know very well about the challenges and hardships that any student has
to go through to attain the Ph.D. degree; a lot of factors like supervisor, topic
chosen, publications, etc. have a cumulative affect on the duration of any
student’s Ph.D. Ideally, any person would be completing PhD by the age of 27-28
years if he/she had an academic career without any gaps or breaks. In the field
of academics, a person attaining the doctorate by the age of around 35 years is
considered to be “young”. So it is merely a myth that the students of JNU are
in the University campus for the fun just in the name of “subsidized
education.”
While talking about subsidized
education, an important fact is that a number of countries provide “free
education” to their children; so why not India? And why is it that always
education is considered as “wasting the tax payer’s money?”. Crores of rupees
were invested in building “The Statue of Unity” as well as in all the foreign
visits that all the government ministers undertake – so why doesn’t the media
talk about tax payers’ money in these cases? Why isn’t tax payers’ money being
utilized to provide clean water, proper hygiene and sanitation and most
importantly on ensuring women’s safety? Tax payers’ money can be utilized to
building and maintaining a 50 feet high flag post on a hill top that can be
viewed from the entire city but not for providing proper nourishment to the
children dying of malnutrition. And anyone who questions the govt. in these
issues, he or she is branded as an “Anti-national!”
JNU is one educational
institution that has provided the country with people like Nirmala Sitharaman
and from where students crack IAS examinations every year. And if we forget JNU
for one second, this same step will be taken soon on all the IITs and NITs!
These are the premiere institutions of the country that have shaped up students
brilliantly – taught them to voice their opinions, to take correct stand and so
on. JNU is only one institution which had the courage to come out and protest against it. But steps are again taken to curb such voices who dare to raise questions –
but isn’t “Freedom of Speech” our fundamental right?
I came across one news piece
where the TV anchor was screaming the words like this – “Mehez 300 rupaye dene me inn students ko problem ho rahi hai – 300
rupaye jo ye log shayad ek din CCD me ek coffee pe kharch kar de!” I just
want to say to people with such mindset that how will you know the pain of a
family whose monthly income is 1200-1500 rupees? In that amount, the bread
earner has to mange rent, food, clothing, educate the children and save some
(if possible) for a rainy day too. Places like JNU are the only institutions where
brilliant students from the poor section of the country can afford to get
educated. India is not a developed
country like the USA or UK – we still have villages where there is no water and
electricity. If students from humble background manage to get selected in these
institutions, does the govt. want them to quit everything and work as a laborer
like their father? We are still a country where people change their tracks if a
black cat crosses our path. Is it possible that just by showing the “Antilla (Ambani’s
residence)” in Mumbai and ignoring the huge slums in the same city, the govt.
can claim to have achieved “Vikas” or development on the global platform?
On one hand the govt.talks about
development and bright future but on the other hand they are making means to
curtail the education on students who are going to make up “that bright future!”
Hypocrisy in its extreme peak, isn’t it? This outrage is not mine alone – it is
there the minds of all the “sane minded” Indians but not everyone can voice their
opinion, can they?
Comments
Post a Comment